arXiv Paper Proposes Tempered Evidence Fusion for Scoring Values in Long Posts

New arXiv Method for Long-Text Value Measurement

An arXiv preprint (arXiv:2609.27165v1, announced by ArXiv CS.CL) proposes Tempered Evidence Fusion, a training-free rule for measuring value orientations in long social media posts using large language models. The authors' stated problem: such posts mix background, quotations, and concessions with only a few stance-bearing sentences, so document-level prompting can be overconfident while majority or soft voting over sentences treats uncertain and decisive sentences as equally informative. TEF weights each sentence's log-odds by its normalized information gain, derived from a generalized Bayesian posterior, so uncertain sentences nearly drop out while decisive evidence keeps its Bayes-optimal weight. The paper also introduces MIND (Multi-event Insight Network Dimensions), a benchmark of 8,358 Chinese and English posts spanning five years of public events and six value dimensions. The authors report TEF outperforms the strongest baseline among Direct, Majority Vote, and Soft Vote by an average of 4.5 accuracy points and 4.6 macro-F1 points across five LLMs and two languages. These are the authors' reported results on their own benchmark; independent replication is not in evidence. Dataset and code are linked from the abstract. [1]